10.6084/m9.figshare.11610057.v1 Armando Otávio Vilar de Araújo Armando Otávio Vilar de Araújo Danielle Dutra Araújo Danielle Dutra Araújo Alice Helena de Araújo Silva Nogueira Alice Helena de Araújo Silva Nogueira Annie Karoline Feijó Costa Annie Karoline Feijó Costa Camila Procópio Andrada Camila Procópio Andrada Fabiana de Sousa Filgueira Fabiana de Sousa Filgueira Laís de Carvalho Pinheiro Laís de Carvalho Pinheiro Ethical judgment in Rio Grande do Norte between 2000 and 2015 SciELO journals 2020 Medical errors Health’s judicialization Ethics, medical 2020-01-15 04:43:13 Dataset https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Ethical_judgment_in_Rio_Grande_do_Norte_between_2000_and_2015/11610057 <p></p><p>Abstract With the increasing lawsuits against physicians, whether in the civil, administrative or criminal sphere, the judicialization of medicine has become increasingly common. Therefore, it is essential that medical professionals know the current reality and are prepared to face it. Based on this principle, this study investigated the archives of the Conselho Regional de Medicina (Regional Council of Medicine) for the State of Rio Grande do Norte in order to raise complaints received, investigations, prosecutions and judgments as well as disciplinary penalties applied between 2000 and 2015. After analyzing the data, it was observed that a higher rate of male physicians were reported, and a small number of penalties applied. The research concludes that it is necessary to invest in the prevention of errors through quality and continuous medical education in order to maintain a good relationship between professionals and patients.</p><p></p>