%0 Generic %A Rovaris, Karla %A Queiroz, Polyane Mazucatto %A Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria %A Corpas, LĂ­via dos Santos %A Silveira, Bernardo Mattos da %A Freitas, Deborah Queiroz %D 2018 %T Segmentation Methods for Micro CT Images: A Comparative Study Using Human Bone Samples %U https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/Segmentation_Methods_for_Micro_CT_Images_A_Comparative_Study_Using_Human_Bone_Samples/6503153 %R 10.6084/m9.figshare.6503153.v1 %2 https://scielo.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/11954486 %2 https://scielo.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/11954489 %2 https://scielo.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/11954492 %2 https://scielo.figshare.com/ndownloader/files/11954504 %K x-ray microtomography %K threshold limit values %K histomorfometry %K bone. %X

Abstract X-ray microtomography (microCT) is a nondestructive technique used to assess bone morphometry. For an accurate analysis, it is necessary to segment the bone tissue from the background images, avoiding under- or overestimation of the real bone volume. Thus, segmentation methods for microCT can influence the accuracy of bone morphometry analysis. The purpose of this study was to compare two different image segmentation methods available on microCT software (subjective and objective) regarding to the human bone morphometric analysis. Sixteen samples containing a fixation screws covered by 0.5-1mm of bone were scanned using the SkyScan 1173 scanner. Three examiners segmented the microCT images subjectively and recorded the threshold values. Subsequently, an objective segmentation was also done. The 3D analysis was performed for both images using the values previously determined in CTAn software. Five bone morphometric parameters were calculated (BV/TV, Tb.Th, Tb.N, Tb.Sp, Conn.Den) and used as dependent variables. ANOVA showed no significant differences between the methods concerning BV/TV (p=0.424), Tb.N (p=0.672), Tb.Th (p=0.183), Tb.Sp (p=0.973) and Conn.Den (p=0.204). Intra- and interobserver agreement ranged from satisfactory to excellent (0.55-1 and 0.546-0.991, respectively). Therefore, results obtained with subjective threshorlding were similar to those obtained with objective segmentation. Since objective segmentation does not have human input and it is a truly objective method, it should be the first choice in microCT studies that concern homogeneity and high resolution human bone sample.

%I SciELO journals