10.6084/m9.figshare.9276110.v1 Alysson Figueiredo Nogueira Alysson Figueiredo Nogueira Lucas Moratelli Lucas Moratelli Marcela dos Santos Martins Marcela dos Santos Martins Ricardo Torres Iupi Ricardo Torres Iupi Marcos Felipe Marcatto de Abreu Marcos Felipe Marcatto de Abreu João Carlos Nakamoto João Carlos Nakamoto EVALUATION OF DISTAL FOREARM FRACTURES USING THE AO 2018 CLASSIFICATION SciELO journals 2019 Radius Fractures Ulna Fractures Wrist Injuries 2019-08-07 02:42:35 Dataset https://scielo.figshare.com/articles/dataset/EVALUATION_OF_DISTAL_FOREARM_FRACTURES_USING_THE_AO_2018_CLASSIFICATION/9276110 <div><p>ABSTRACT Objective: Distal forearm fractures are among the most common upper limb fractures in all ages, and many classifications have been proposed to describe them. Recently, a new version of AO/OTA classification was proposed. The aim of this study is to use the AO/OTA 2018 classification to report the epidemiology of distal forearm fractures in adults treated at a single center. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the initial radiographs obtained from cases of distal forearm fractures in an orthopedic emergency room at a single tertiary hospital. Results: Three hundred twenty-two cases were studied, aged 50.35 ± 18.98 years, 55.3% were female and 44.7% were right-sided. Type 2R3A, 2R3B and 2R3C fractures corresponded to 32.3%, 18.0% and 48.4% of the cases, respectively. Distal ulnar fracture was present in 41.9%. There was a correlation between age and sex: 78.3% of the subjects aged under 30 years were male, and 80.6% of those aged over 60 years were female (p<0.001). Conclusion: The most common type of radial fractures was 2R3C, and the most common type of ulna fracture was 2U3A1.1. There was a correlation between age and sex. Level of evidence IV, Case-series.</p></div>